政策解讀
快速擇校
Here’s my simple test for a product of today’s technology: I go to the bookstore and check the shelves for remedial books. The more books, the more my suspicions are raised. If computers and computer programs supposedly are getting easier to use, why are so many companies still making a nice living publishing books on how to use them?
Computers manipulate information, but information is invisible. There’s nothing to see or touch. The programmer decides what you see on the screen. Computers don’ t have knobs like old radios. They don’ t have buttons, not real buttons. Instead, more and more programs display pictures of buttons, moving even further into abstraction and arbitrariness. I like computers, but I hope they will disappear, that they will seem as strange to our descendants as the technologies of our grandparents appear to us. Today’s computers are indeed getting easier to us, but look where they started: so difficult that almost any improvement was welcome.
Computer have the power to allow people within a company, caress a nation or even around the world to work together. But this power will be wasted if to-morrow’s computers aren’t designed around the needs and capabilities of the human beings who must use them — a people-centered philosophy, in other words. That means retooling computers to mesh with human strengths — observing, communicating and innovating — instead of asking people to conform to the unnatural behavior computers demand. That just leads to error.
Many of today’s machines try to do too much. When a complicated word processor attempts to double as a desktop pulsing program or a kitchen appliance comes with half a dozen attachments, the product is bound to be unwieldy and burdensome. My favorite example of a technological product on just the right scale an electronic dictionary. It can be made smaller, lighter and far easier to use than a print version, not only giving meanings but even pronouncing the words. Today’s electronic dictionaries, with their tiny keys and barely legible displays, are primitive but they’re on the right track.
1. The reason why the author often checks the remedial books is that _____________.
A. he is interested in reading books
B. he wants to find out whether they are helpful to readers
C. he intends to test a new technological product
D. he tries to make it clear why there are so many remedial books
2. In the author’s view, the picture of button on the computer screen ____________.
A. has the same function as knobs of a radio
B. cause more complexity and ambiguity
C. will certainly disappear in the near future
D. presents the development in technology
3. The main idea of the 3rd paragraph is ________.
A. computers will enable people work more efficiently
B. there will be a wide gap between computers and their users
C. computers should he re-designed so as to make them able to observe, communicate and innovate like man
D. computers should abide by the people-phi1osophy
4. "Machine" in the 4th paragraph refers to _______________.
A. computers
B. a word processor and a kitchen appliance
C. technological devices
D. electric dictionaries
5. Concerning the author’s attitude towards computers, which of the following is most suitable?
A. He doubts the convenience of computers
B. He loves them, but proposes to change them.
C. He doesn’t like them at all, but has to rely on it for his job.
D. He is dissatisfied with nowadays-technological development.
答案:CBDAB
特別聲明:①凡本網注明稿件來源為"原創"的,轉載必須注明"稿件來源:育路網",違者將依法追究責任;
②部分稿件來源于網絡,如有侵權,請聯系我們溝通解決。
武漢在職研究生院校排名里,211院校是重點。中南財經政法大學等多所211院校提供在職研項目,以同等學力申碩為主,有網絡班等靈活授課,部分滿足條件可免試入學,學費...
張靜初近年專注讀書、直播寫作業,因專科出身若未拿到碩士學位證,可走國內非全日制(滿足工作經驗等條件,參加統考)或國外國際碩士(選入學要求寬松院校)路徑。國際碩士...
在職研究生可以評職稱,有明確的政策依據,不同類型(雙證、單證)在職研究生在評職稱中適用情況不同,具有縮短評審年限等優勢,文中推薦了適合的項目及注意事項。本文詳解...
山東在職研究生證書認可度較高,非全日制研究生雙證在體制內評職稱、跳槽求職中與全日制效力等同;同等學力申碩學位證在專業能力證明、職場晉升中受認可,滿足山東職場對學...
在職研究生招生條件因類型不同而有差異。非全日制研究生需本科畢業或?茲M一定年限;同等學力申碩入學無嚴格學歷限制,申碩需本科有學位滿3年;中外合作辦學多要求本科或...
國際政治在職研究生入學條件分類國際政治在職研究生有研修班入學、同等學力申碩入學兩個階段,條件和要求不同,想知道國際政治在
評論0
“無需登錄,可直接評論...”