政策解讀
快速擇校
When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it´s amazing how little we have developed in other respects. We may speak contemptuously of the poor old Romans because they relished the orgies of slaughter that went on in their arenas. We may despise them because they mistook these goings on for entertainment. We may forgive them condescendingly because they lived 2000 years ago and obviously knew no better. But are our feelings of superiority really justified? Are we any less blood-thirsty? Why do boxing matches, for instance, attract such universal interest? Don´t the spectators who attend them hope they will see some violence? Human beings remains as bloodthirsty as ever they were. The only difference between ourselves and the Romans is that while they were honest enough to admit that they enjoyed watching hungey lions tearing people apart and eating them alive, we find all sorts of sophisticated arguments to defend sports which should have been banned long age; sports which are quite as barbarous as, say, public hangings or bearbaiting.
It really is incredible that in this day and age we should still allow hunting or bull-fighting, that we should be prepared to sit back and watch two men batter each other to pulp in a boxing ring, that we should be relatively unmoved by the sight of one or a number of racing cars crashing and bursting into flames. Let us not deceive ourselves. Any talk of ´the sporting spirit´ is sheer hypocrisy. People take part in violent sports because of the high rewards they bring. Spectators are willing to pay vast sums of money to see violence. A world heavyweight championship match, for instance, is front page news. Millions of people are disappointed if a big fight is over in two rounds instead of fifteen. They feel disappointment because they have been deprived of the exquisite pleasure of witnessing prolonged torture and violence.
Why should we ban violent sports if people enjoy them so much? You may well ask. The answer is simple: they are uncivilized. For centuries man has been trying to improve himself spiritually and emotionally – admittedly with little success. But at least we no longer tolerate the sight madmen cooped up in cages, or public floggings of any of the countless other barbaric practices which were common in the past. Prisons are no longer the grim forbidding places they used to be. Social welfare systems are in operation in many parts of the world. Big efforts are being made to distribute wealth fairly. These changes have come about not because human beings have suddenly and unaccountably improved, but because positive steps were taken to change the law. The law is the biggest instrument of social change that we have and it may exert great civilizing influence. If we banned dangerous and violent sports, we would be moving one step further to improving mankind. We would recognize that violence is degrading and unworthy of human beings.
1. It can be inferred from the passage that the author´s opinion of nowadays´ human beings is _____.
[A] not very high
[B] high
[C] contemptuous
[D] critical
2. The main idea of this passage is _____.
[A] vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law
[B] people are willing to pay vast sums money to see violence
[C] to compare two different attitudes towards dangerous sports
[D] people are bloodthirsty in sports
3. That the author mentions the old Romans is _____.
[A] To compare the old Romans with today´s people
[B] to give an example
[C] to show human beings in the past know nothing better
[D] to indicate human beings are used to bloodthirsty
4. How many dangerous sports does the author mention in this passage?
[A] Three.
[B] Five.
[C] Six.
[D] Seven.
5. The purpose of the author in writing this passage is _____.
[A] that, by banning the violent sports, we human beings can improve our selves
[B] that, by banning the dangerous sports, we can improve the law
[C] that we must take positive steps to improve social welfare system
[D] to show law is the main instrument of social change
答案:A A D B A
特別聲明:①凡本網注明稿件來源為"原創"的,轉載必須注明"稿件來源:育路網",違者將依法追究責任;
②部分稿件來源于網絡,如有侵權,請聯系我們溝通解決。
口腔醫學在職研究生有專業型碩士和學術型碩士,專業型需有口腔醫學專業學歷且有執業醫師資格等,學術型要求本科及以上學歷等。多所院校招生,不同院校專業學費不同,同等學...
天津雙證在職研究生院校有河北工業大學、天津大學等。雙證指非全日制研究生,需參加全國統考,每年10月報名,過國家線有機會錄取,畢業獲學歷證與學位證,學信網可查,認...
金融學在職研究生報考,非全日制方式要求本科畢業或專科畢業滿2年,初試與全日制考試科目相同;同等學力申碩方式,大專及以上學歷可報名課程學習,本科有學位滿3年可申碩...
北京在職研究生錄取分數線迎來新變化,高校招生政策調整直接影響錄取機制。新政策聚焦分數線設定標準、專業招生比例優化等核心要素,旨在提升教育質量。這些變動對在職考生...
在職醫生報考醫學在職研究生常面臨工作與學習平衡的挑戰。本文提供全面攻略,詳細解析報名流程、資格審核和考試準備策略,包括高效復習方法和時間管理技巧。注意事項部分強...
信息與通信工程在職研究生若通過同等學力申碩方式,入學無需考試。申碩階段考試一般考外語(如英語、法語等)和專業課(涵蓋信號與系統、通信原理等)。考試通過標準為及格...
評論0
“無需登錄,可直接評論...”